Another
challenging week of reading and video consumption. I had not realised how complicated
issues of copyright and licenses with varying amounts of permissions could be.
It is important information to be able to learn, remember, and use.
David Wiley’s
presentation at LCCOER Defining OER was
most illuminating. David used a lot of metaphor and examples and made the
content so clear and entertaining. He spoke about education as sharing. In
fact, he went as far as to say that “all
the things that are actually truly educative about our work are all acts of
sharing, full stop.” Yes, I agree 100%. That is what drew me to Open
Education. Sharing is the key.
When competing
my OER Evangelism video, I was impressed by Alby Fitisemanu also saying that
education is not selfish… that education is sharing. It is so true. I have
always loved teaching and I have always been a teacher surrounded by love. I
truly have always loved my students. I have shared myself, shared my ideas,
shared my insights, and been the recipient of so much knowledge that my students
have shared with me. I have so many wonderful tributes from students. I will
share two briefly. Selena mentioned I had, “unwavering support, passion and commitment
to education, and to the students of South Auckland.” And Rebecca stated, “She
has shown me how to be gentle towards others and myself and when I'm down, to
brush myself off and get back on the horse and start again.”
Where's Wally? Or, should I say Where's Merle? |
In New Zealand
the Māori and Pasifika peoples have cultures of sharing, and, thankfully, this
has had an impact on the beliefs and practices of educators. The most
collaborative and sharing group of educators I have ever met, are those I have
had the pleasure of working with in virtual worlds since 2008. My first
presentation at my first conference was about the collaborative nature of
virtual world education (eFest, 2009).
Meeting of the Virtual Worlds Working Group |
David went on
to tell the story of a beautiful land with meadows, flowers and bees that didn’t
sting. Travel across this beautiful land was made possible by the invention on the
automobile and roads. A law was passed that whatever “whiz-bang” gadget was used,
it had to stay on the roads. With the exciting development of the airplane, the
law to stay on the roads became stifling and unproductive. In this little
analogy, copyright is the airplane of education. David highlighted the fact
that all the powerful things the Internet makes possible are harnessed and even
prohibited by copyright. David’s solution: “So the answer to how do we get this
plane in the air is open educational resources.” It certainly makes sense.
Get this plane in the air with OER |
The 5 R’s: retain,
reuse, revise, remix, and redistribute (the permissions described by the
Creative Commons license system – for more explanation see the previous post,
dated 14th October, Understanding the Commons or check out the delightful little video from Creative Commons called Wanna Work Together).
Retain is the most basic permission because if you do not have the resource in
hand, you cannot reuse, revise, remix, or redistribute it!
The idea of faux-pen (fake open) was mentioned in David’s presentation. I love this
term!!!!! It immediately brought to mind my first experiences using Canvas, at
the start of this year. I had been a power user in BlackBoard for 16 years. At
the end of 2016, with only a couple of month’s warning, the institution
switched from BlackBoard to Canvas. In my first Canvas training session, I was
elated seeing the long, long list of Apps that could be used in Canvas. I was
going to have fun!!!
As the months
went on, I discovered how few apps were really available! I even asked for a
list of freely accessible apps, and after receiving a list of over a hundred,
narrowed it down to 24 I wanted to investigate for the purposes of preparing my
new course, Appreciation of eLearning
Tools. After hours of disappointments, I found four that I could use. I had
an equally frustrating time hunting down free online apps. They were free for a
time and then required payment.
Stephen Downes
mentioned another related problem with the CC Licensing system. The dichotomy
of whether open can be commercial or whether it should be non-commercial. Could
legal, commercial use of a CC Licensed product cause it to be labelled as
faux-pen?
One of the
most inspirational parts of David’s presentation was in his description of the 3
R’s relating to the adoption of an OE resource: replace, realign, and rethink.
David used a delightful analogy of going to a buffet. A wide array of dishes is
available. You know you like beef and broccoli, so you only eat the beef and
broccoli. What a shame to not try the other available delicacies. To replace or
substitute is fine, but there is more to a buffet than beef and broccoli.
Whi limit yourself to beef and broccoli? |
Realign refers
to making sure that whatever replacement you choose, satisfies the Learning
Objectives of the course you are delivering. David suggests using the Learning
Objectives or Learning Outcomes as the Table of Contents for an OE replacement
text. David uses another analogy of selecting the furnishings in a living room.
The objectives or outcomes are the items in the living room. As an educator,
you can use the range of OERs available as a catalogue of possible furnishings.
And then Rethink takes the OER adoption further into decisions based on Open
Learning Pedagogies.
OERs online - your catalogue of furnishings |
I was very
motivated and excited to read about renewable assignments. I am busy preparing
course material for a Certificate in Tertiary Teaching course in Creative
Delivery. David’s ideas for the Kung Fu assignment, the student adapted and edited
book on Project Management, and the idea of the project management certified
professional certificate, to motivate students to collect their own exam preparation
content in an OER, are all brilliant! Great ideas from a great mind!
Norman Bier,
from Carnegie Mellon’s Open Learning Initiative, spoke (very quickly) about One
Superpower of OER. This superpower refers to the ability of OER to tackle the
Gordian Knot, the seemingly intractable and complicated issue of institutional
creation, use, and ownership. OER can provide a solution that addresses the
needs of the educators, their institutions, and their legal departments and
associated organisations.
Representing the Tertiary Teaching Unit |
No comments:
Post a Comment